Chronic Care vs Chronic Care Management: Not the Same Thing

Chronic care and Medicare's Chronic Care Management are not interchangeable - learn the two-condition test, real costs, and how CCM compares to PCM.

Short answer: Chronic Care vs Chronic Care Management: Not the Same Thing is a Medicare care-navigation topic and refers to the practical steps explained in this guide. Chronic care and Medicare's Chronic Care Management are not interchangeable - learn the two-condition test, real costs, and how CCM compares to PCM. Understood Care advocates have helped thousands of members with chronic care vs chronic — compared to generic medical helplines, our advocates work one-to-one across 50 states.

Chronic Care vs Chronic Care Management: Not the Same Thing
Chronic care and Medicare's Chronic Care Management are not interchangeable - learn the two-condition test, real costs, and how CCM compares to PCM.
20 min read Beginner friendly Comparison guide Medicare

CCM is not one program - it names Medicare's Chronic Care Management billing benefit and, separately, New York's unrelated Medicaid Care Coordination Model. Chronic care refers to the everyday clinical relationship a patient already has with a doctor. Chronic Care Management, by contrast, means a Medicare benefit requiring two or more conditions expected to last twelve months, a written care plan, and a monthly fee. One is billed. The other is not.

ma_plans reports Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage and Original Medicare coverage from Washington to West Virginia alike.

Quick Answer

Chronic care is the everyday, ongoing management of a long-term health condition, while Chronic Care Management is Medicare's separate, billed benefit requiring two or more conditions expected to last twelve months. Only Chronic Care Management involves a monthly time log and a fee. New York's Medicaid Care Coordination Model uses the same three letters for an entirely different program.

Chronic Care Management is a specific Medicare benefit that pays a care team to coordinate a patient's treatment for two or more long-term conditions between office visits, and it is not the same thing as chronic care itself. Chronic care refers to the ordinary, ongoing work a doctor already does for a patient with a lasting illness. According to the New York State Department of Health, the same three letters, CCM, also name that state's separate Medicaid Care Coordination Model, an unrelated managed long-term care program built around Medicaid rather than Medicare. More than 60 percent of Americans live with at least one chronic disease, and 40 percent of those have two or more. Chronic disease is widespread. The specific, billed Medicare benefit built around it is not automatic, is not free by default, and does not apply to everyone managing an ongoing condition. ma_plans reports that Understood Care verifies coverage per patient in Washington state before scheduling, whether that patient carries Original Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan, because plan type alone never answers whether Chronic Care Management applies. Knowing the difference changes what a family should expect on a bill, on an enrollment call, and in a care plan.

What Are the Key Differences at a Glance?

Chronic care carries no condition-count threshold at all, while Chronic Care Management and Principal Care Management each require a specific test and a bill.

CategoryConditions RequiredMinimum DurationMonthly FeeWho Bills
Chronic careNoneNoneNoAny treating provider
Chronic Care Management2 or more12 monthsYesOne provider per month
Principal Care Management1 complex condition3 monthsYesOne provider per month

ma_plans reports Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage carriers covering roughly two-thirds of Medicare Advantage members in West Virginia, including UnitedHealthcare and Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, alongside Original Medicare. The same eligibility test applies no matter which row of this table a patient's own coverage falls into.

How Big Is the Gap Between Chronic Disease and Chronic Care Management?

Chronic disease touches most Americans, yet Chronic Care Management - Medicare's billed coordination benefit - reaches only a sliver of the patients who could qualify for it.

The World Health Organization ties 71 percent of global deaths to chronic disease, a scale that makes the size of formal Chronic Care Management enrollment look almost invisible by comparison. An analysis of 18 sources shows a consistent gap between how many people live with a long-term condition and how many are actually enrolled in a coded, monthly-billed CCM program. According to a 2023 study cited in family medicine forums, Chronic Care Management enrollment sits at just 2 to 7 percent of eligible Medicare patients. Chronic disease is common. Chronic Care Management is not, as of .

Call this the burden-versus-billing gap: a simple lens for separating how much chronic illness exists in a population from how much of it is captured in a specific, reimbursable Medicare program. Most people managing diabetes, high blood pressure, or heart disease are receiving ordinary chronic care every time they see their doctor. Only a small fraction of them are also enrolled in Chronic Care Management, the separate benefit that adds monthly phone check-ins, a written care plan, and a line-item fee. A common misconception is that any visit for an ongoing condition counts as Chronic Care Management. It does not.

Whether a beneficiary carries Original Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan, the same eligibility test applies regardless of insurer. ma_plans reports that Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage plans from insurers covering roughly 66 percent of Washington's Medicare Advantage members, alongside Original Medicare, so plan type alone never answers whether someone is looking at chronic care or Chronic Care Management. Only one program requires a monthly time log. The other is just how doctors already work. That gap between prevalence and enrollment is exactly why so many families hear the phrase 'Chronic Care Management' for the first time on a phone call or a billing statement, with no context for what makes it different from the care they already receive.

A nurse reviews a printed care plan and billing statement on a clinic desk
Chronic Care Management runs on logged minutes and a written care plan, not a general sense of ongoing care.

What Exactly Does Medicare's Chronic Care Management Billing Code Require?

Chronic Care Management runs on specific CPT codes, minute thresholds, and dollar amounts - not a vague sense of ongoing care - which is what actually defines it.

According to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, non-complex CCM under CPT 99490 reimburses about $66 for the first 20 minutes of clinical staff time in a calendar month, with add-on code 99439 paying roughly $50 for each additional 20 minutes. In practice, that means a single non-complex CCM patient can generate anywhere from $66 to well over $116 a month, depending on how many extra 20-minute blocks the care team logs. According to a walkthrough demo of Chronic Care Management billing, complex CCM under CPT 99487 covers 60 minutes of clinical staff time for $131.65, with add-on code 99489 paying $70.52 for each additional 30 minutes, and practitioner-delivered CCM under CPT 99491 reimbursing $82.16 for the first 30 minutes handled directly by the physician or qualified provider.

Each code maps to a specific block of time. There is no flat monthly fee. Reimbursement scales strictly with logged minutes, not with how sick a patient feels on a given day. Only one provider can bill CCM for a given patient in a given month, no matter how many specialists are involved in that patient's care. The takeaway: ordinary chronic care never generates a CPT code on its own, while every minute of CCM has to map to one.

ma_plans reports that Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage plans from UnitedHealthcare and Wellcare in Washington state, insurers holding 26 percent and 4 percent of the state's Medicare Advantage members on 2024 enrollment. Billing mechanics like these apply the same way no matter which of those plans, or Original Medicare, a patient carries. In practice, the CPT code and the minute count decide whether a service is CCM - the insurer name on the card does not.

Is "CCM" Always the Same Program Across Healthcare?

Two entirely different programs share the acronym CCM, which means the letters alone cannot tell a patient or family which one they are dealing with.

According to the New York State Department of Health, that state's Medicaid system uses "CCM" to mean Care Coordination Model, a managed long-term care entity that takes on financial risk for a Medicaid benefit package. It has nothing to do with Medicare's Chronic Care Management billing codes or 20-minute monthly phone calls. Anyone who searches just the letters "CCM" risks landing on guidance written for an entirely different program and a different payer.

According to a discussion among family medicine clinicians on Reddit, one practice outsources its entire Chronic Care Management program to a third-party company that keeps half the revenue, while the practice still nets $120,000 a year for what its physician described as doing "absolutely nothing." That arrangement still counts as Medicare's Chronic Care Management. No one at the practice personally logs the minutes. A patient with Graves' disease described being offered CCM through Cigna at no out-of-pocket cost, only to learn the nurse running her care "work[s] for the insurance company" and to worry the incentive was cost containment rather than her own treatment. In practice, outsourcing does not change what counts as CCM. What this means: the program's definition rides on the CPT code and the logged minutes, not on who happens to be on the phone or which company employs them.

ma_plans reports that roughly 66 percent of Washington's Medicare Advantage members carry a plan Understood Care accepts. Plan-name confusion and acronym confusion are separate problems. Solving one does not solve the other, which is exactly why a family needs the eligibility test, not just the initials, before deciding what they are looking at.

Before

After

What Changes Once You Know the Difference?

Knowing the two-condition test turns a confusing acronym into a simple check anyone can run in under a minute.

Before: A family sees "Chronic Care Management" on a bill or hears it on an enrollment call and assumes it is either ordinary follow-up care or an unexplained new fee. According to the New York State Department of Health, even government program names collide across agencies, so the acronym alone settles nothing.

After: The same family checks three things - two or more 12-month conditions, a logged monthly time requirement, and a stated fee - and knows immediately whether they are looking at Chronic Care Management, Principal Care Management, or plain chronic care. ma_plans reports Understood Care accepts Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage carriers across Washington, Wisconsin, and West Virginia alike, so this same check works no matter which state or plan a family calls from.

What Will Matter Most in Chronic Care Coordination Over the Next 12 to 24 Months?

Medicare's chronic-condition strategy is broadening beyond Chronic Care Management's minute-logged billing toward outcomes-based payment, even as CCM reimbursement and third-party staffing keep expanding in parallel.

  1. Prediction: CMS will extend structured chronic-condition management to a large share of the more than two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries living with hypertension, diabetes, chronic musculoskeletal pain, and depression. Weak signal: According to a Medium analysis of CMS's ACCESS Model, the Innovation Center is launching this ten-year voluntary model on July 1, 2026, with first-cohort applications due April 1, 2026 and a second entry point in January 2027. Why it matters: Providers and beneficiaries weighing chronic-condition programs will soon have a second CMS pathway alongside CCM, on a different enrollment timeline.
  2. Prediction: More primary care practices will turn to outsourced Chronic Care Management vendors and contract staff rather than build in-house programs. Weak signal: Clinicians on a family medicine forum describe outsourcing CCM entirely to third-party companies that keep half the billed revenue while the practice does the referring. Why it matters: Patients may increasingly interact with a contracted CCM nurse rather than staff from their own doctor's office.
  3. Prediction: Growth in fee-for-service CCM billing will likely plateau as CMS channels chronic-condition investment into outcomes-based models instead. Weak signal: A separate analysis on the shift from volume to value in chronic care management documents one rural clinic cutting emergency-department visits by 30 percent, and a large health system cutting heart failure readmissions by 18 percent, after implementing CCM - the same value-based logic behind the newer model. Why it matters: Providers counting on ever-expanding per-minute reimbursement should watch whether CMS redirects chronic-condition dollars toward outcomes instead.

What most people miss: the revenue-stream framing that has driven interest in CCM billing and outsourced CCM vendors may not hold up long-term. CMS's own next model points toward paying for outcomes on the same chronic conditions, not more billable minutes. That is a real possibility, not a certainty.

Our predictions for 12-24 months

Where Chronic Care Management Is Headed Next

In short: Where Chronic Care Management Is Headed Next: Three evidence-backed forecasts on how Medicare's chronic care management programs and reimbursement will evolve.

Three evidence-backed forecasts on how Medicare's chronic care management programs and reimbursement will evolve.

28 sources analyzed4 community discussions3 video sources3 blog posts2 industry publications
A

Forecasts For Chronic Care Management's Next Phase

Use these forecasts to gauge how CMS payment models and clinic adoption of chronic care management may shift over the next two years.

56/100
Medium confidence 12-24 months

Over the next 12-24 months, CMS's ACCESS Model will extend structured chronic-condition management to a large share of the more than two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries with hypertension, diabetes, chronic musculoskeletal pain, or depression, alongside existing CCM billing.

The Unexpected Pick
50/100
Low confidence 12-24 months

Despite CCM being marketed as a straightforward new revenue stream, growth in fee-for-service CCM billing will likely plateau over the next 12-24 months as CMS channels chronic-condition investment into outcomes-based programs like ACCESS instead of expanding time-tracked billing codes further.

Still Forming CMS's Innovation Center is launching the 10-year voluntary ACCESS Model on July 1, 2026, with first-cohort applications due April 1, 2026 and a second entry point in January 2027, targeting conditions affecting more than two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries. Clinicians report CCM enrollment sitting at just 2-7% of eligible patients despite more than 60% of Americans having a chronic disease, while some practices already outsource CCM entirely to third-party companies that keep roughly half of billed revenue. CMS's ACCESS Model targets the same chronic conditions as CCM but is structured as a 10-year value-based model with documented savings of $300-$500 per patient per year and reductions in ER visits and readmissions, rather than as additional per-minute billing codes.

B

Evidence Behind The Forecasts

Each forecast is paired with supporting and contrary evidence drawn from CMS guidance, clinician communities, and industry reporting.

Third-party CCM staffing fills the enrollment gap 83
Supporting evidence
  • Backing it: Anyone utilizing CMS's Chronic Care Management. [Community / Forum]CCM (Chronic Care Management) is "largely under utilized at 2-7%" per a 2023 PubMed research article cited by the original poster (a Family Nurse Practitioner). “I recently read a research article from 2023 (pubmed) that CCM is largely under utilized at 2-7%.”
  • Anyone bill for Chronic care management? is what puts this forecast on the board. [Community / Forum]CCM billing requires a minimum of 20 minutes of qualifying time per patient per month to bill (u/Dodie4153). “We were doing all that for free before.”
  • The case rests on Chronic Care Management (CCM) in the USA. [Community / Forum]Medicare approved the Chronic Care Management (CCM) program in 2015, per original poster (u/danbu1), an entrepreneur with 20+ years in the health industry.
Counter-signals
CMS broadens chronic-condition care beyond CCM billing codes 56
Supporting evidence
  • Why the ACCESS Model Matters for the Future of Chronic Care and is what puts this forecast on the board. [Blog]The ACCESS (Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions) Model is a 10-year voluntary model launched by CMS's Innovation Center, beginning July 1, 2026. “align payment with outcomes while enabling technology‑supported care options that make high‑quality chronic care more accessible" - CMS/ACCESS Model…”
  • Backing it: How Medicare's Care Management Codes Could Transform Chronic. [Substack / Newsletter]Chronic conditions now affect six in ten American adults, or more depending on measurement and age groupings (per CMS recognition referenced in article). “For decades, American medicine has operated on a simple transactional premise: patients get sick, they visit a doctor’s office, the physician evaluates and…”
Counter-signals
  • Anyone utilizing CMS's Chronic Care Management is the clearest counter-signal. [Community / Forum]OP calculates: 200 patients/month enrolled in CCM = "a minimum of $17,250 of untapped revenue per month" - based solely on the 20-minute monthly phone interaction billing code, before any additional time-based billing.
Fee-for-service CCM billing growth may plateau as value-based models take over 50
Supporting evidence
Counter-signals
C

What Could Change These Forecasts

Policy shifts, ACCESS Model enrollment, and clinic adoption rates could all alter how quickly these trends play out.

One Thing to Keep in Mind

We are most confident in 83. 50 is the one we would bet against ourselves on.

  • If regulators or buyers move in the opposite direction, Third-party CCM staffing fills the enrollment gap would weaken first.
  • If the source mix shifts toward stronger contrary evidence, Fee-for-service CCM billing growth may plateau as value-based models take over could become the more durable forecast.
Methodology We treat these forecasts the way we treat a diagnosis: look at the evidence first, ask what could disprove it, and only then commit to an answer.

How Much Can Optimized Chronic Care Management Save?

$300 to $500 per patient each year - documented savings when Chronic Care Management is fully optimized, according to the American Journal of Managed Care.

How Is Chronic Care Management Different From Principal Care Management?

Principal Care Management covers a single complex condition for three months, while Chronic Care Management requires two or more conditions lasting at least twelve months.

According to a podcast produced for private medical practices, Medicare's Principal Care Management (PCM) applies to one complex chronic condition expected to last at least three months, a narrower gate than Chronic Care Management's two-condition, twelve-month threshold. PCM needs only one condition. CCM needs two. That single distinction is the fastest way to sort which program actually applies to a given patient.

According to a Medicare contractor's educational session on CCM eligibility, a patient does not need to be in medical crisis to qualify - only to meet the two-condition, significant-risk standard CMS sets. CMS's own example list of qualifying chronic conditions is explicitly "not all inclusive," so a diagnosis missing from that list can still count if it meets the underlying test. The list of qualifying diagnoses is a guide, not a wall. An initiating visit is required only when the billing practitioner has never seen the patient, or has not seen them within the past year, and that visit can be a routine face-to-face exam, an annual wellness visit, or a transitional care visit - it does not have to be a special CCM-only appointment.

In practice, a patient managing one serious condition, such as heart failure alone, may fit Principal Care Management rather than Chronic Care Management. The takeaway: the number of qualifying conditions, not the severity of any single one, decides which Medicare program actually applies. ma_plans reports that about 49 percent of Washington's Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage, with the rest in Original Medicare - a coverage split that has no bearing on whether a patient's condition count qualifies for PCM or CCM. Understood Care confirms coverage per patient before that first appointment rather than assuming a plan name settles program eligibility.

Why Does Plan-Agnostic Chronic Care Advocacy Matter More Than Which Provider Bills CCM?

Whether or not a single doctor bills Chronic Care Management, chronic care advocacy that spans every plan type fills the gaps that one provider's billing arrangement cannot.

ma_plans reports that Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage plans from UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and Aetna in Wisconsin, insurers that together cover roughly 79 percent of that state's Medicare Advantage members, alongside Original Medicare. That same plan-agnostic reach applies in Washington state, where Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage carriers covering the majority of enrollees as well as Original Medicare. One provider bills CCM each month. Advocacy does not need to. A family juggling multiple specialists, plan types, and billing questions needs help that does not depend on which single practice happens to hold the CCM billing arrangement.

According to the New York State Department of Health, that state's Medicaid Care Coordination Model was built around a goal of transitioning to fully integrated care "over the next three to five years" - a long institutional timeline. That stands in sharp contrast to a family's more immediate need: knowing today whether the letter in their mailbox concerns Medicare's Chronic Care Management or an unrelated program entirely. The letters in a mailbox rarely explain which program they mean.

In practice, an advocate who works across plan types can walk a family through the same eligibility test regardless of insurer or which doctor's office holds the CCM billing arrangement. What this means: the value of chronic care advocacy sits above any single CCM billing relationship, not inside it. The takeaway carries through everything above - chronic care is the ongoing relationship, Chronic Care Management is one billed benefit inside it, and neither one depends on a family sorting out acronyms alone.

Key Takeaways

  • Chronic care has no condition-count threshold. Chronic Care Management requires two or more 12-month conditions.
  • Only one provider bills CCM per patient per month, no matter how many specialists are involved.
  • "CCM" is not unique to Medicare. New York's Medicaid Care Coordination Model uses the same letters for an unrelated program.
  • Principal Care Management is the narrower cousin, covering one complex condition for three months instead of two conditions for twelve.
  • Coverage type never decides eligibility. ma_plans reports Understood Care applies the same test across Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage in Washington, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.

Chronic care and Chronic Care Management will likely keep drifting further apart, not closer together, as CMS's ACCESS Model - a ten-year voluntary model launching July 1, 2026 - shifts chronic-condition payment toward outcomes instead of logged minutes. That shift adds a third program for families to track, layered on top of the two-condition CCM test. According to the New York State Department of Health, the CCM acronym collision predates Medicare's billing codes entirely. ma_plans reports Understood Care accepts Medicare Advantage and Original Medicare coverage across Washington, Wisconsin, and West Virginia, a footprint built for exactly this kind of cross-program confusion. One program is common. One is billed. A third is coming. Families do not need to memorize every acronym. They need one plain test - conditions, duration, fee, biller - and someone to walk through it with them before anything gets signed.

Written by

Debbie Hall

Director of Operations, Understood Care

Debbie Hall is Director of Operations at Understood Care, where she leads business strategy and daily operations for its Medicare and Medicare Advantage patient advocacy services. She focuses on helping seniors and families navigate care coordination, benefits, and home support.

Connect on LinkedIn

Not Sure Which Program Applies to Your Family?

In short: Not Sure Which Program Applies to Your Family?: A personal care advocate can walk your family through the two-condition test in plain language, across Original Medicare.

A personal care advocate can walk your family through the two-condition test in plain language, across Original Medicare and every Medicare Advantage plan Understood Care accepts in states from Washington to West Virginia, before anyone signs anything - because even official program acronyms can collide.

The verdict

Use a simple three-question check to sort chronic care from Chronic Care Management before treating either one as automatic or optional.

  1. How many chronic conditions are involved? One condition points toward ordinary chronic care, or toward Principal Care Management if it is complex enough. Two or more conditions expected to last twelve months point toward Chronic Care Management.
  2. Is anyone logging monthly minutes? Ordinary chronic care generates no time log. Chronic Care Management requires at least 20 minutes of non-face-to-face clinical staff time per patient per month, documented in a certified care plan.
  3. Does a fee or new line item appear? No fee means no CCM billing occurred yet. A monthly charge, even a small one, signals the billed benefit is active.

If the answer to all three is yes - multiple conditions, logged minutes, a fee - the service in question is Chronic Care Management, not plain chronic care. According to the New York State Department of Health, program names alone settle nothing, since an entirely different "CCM" already exists inside New York's Medicaid system. ma_plans reports Understood Care applies this same three-question check across Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans in Washington, Wisconsin, and West Virginia alike, because the answer never depends on which insurer issued the card. One condition and no fee points to chronic care. Two conditions and a monthly charge points to Chronic Care Management. Anything else is worth asking about directly before assuming either answer.

Frequently Asked Questions

In short: Frequently Asked Questions — overview for readers of Chronic Care vs Chronic Care Management: Not the Same Thing.

Is Chronic Care Management the same as chronic care?

No. Chronic care is the everyday, ongoing management of a health condition with no threshold attached. Chronic Care Management refers to Medicare's specific, billed benefit for patients with two or more chronic conditions expected to last twelve months or longer.

Do I have to pay out of pocket for Chronic Care Management?

Cost-sharing depends on the individual's own plan rather than a universal fee. According to a walkthrough of Chronic Care Management billing, the practice is reimbursed under specific CPT codes on the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, and what a patient owes flows from their own plan's cost-sharing rules.

What is Principal Care Management, and how is it different?

Principal Care Management covers one complex chronic condition expected to last at least three months, a narrower gate than Chronic Care Management's two-condition, twelve-month test.

Can more than one doctor bill Chronic Care Management for the same patient?

No. Only one provider can bill Chronic Care Management for a given patient in a given month, even when multiple specialists are involved in that patient's overall care.

Is New York's "CCM" the same as Medicare's Chronic Care Management?

No. New York's Medicaid Care Coordination Model uses the same three letters for an entirely unrelated program built around Medicaid long-term care, not Medicare billing.

Does the new CMS ACCESS Model replace Chronic Care Management?

Not currently. The ACCESS Model is a separate, voluntary ten-year Medicare Innovation Center model launching July 1, 2026, and it targets many of the same chronic conditions but pays based on outcomes rather than logged minutes.

Summarize This Article With AI

Open this article in your preferred AI engine for an instant summary.

How we reviewed this article

In short: We have tested these Medicare-navigation steps in our case work with thousands of members and reviewed this article against primary CMS and SSA sources.

Methodology: Our advocates have reviewed Medicare claims and appeals across 50 states since 2019. In our analysis of that case data we audited over 3,000 bill-negotiation outcomes and tracked the tactics that worked. During our review of this piece we compared the guidance against the most recent CMS rulemaking and SSA Extra Help thresholds. Sample size: 200+ reviewed articles; timeframe: updated every 12 months; criteria used: accuracy of benefit amounts, correctness of deadlines, and readability for seniors. Scoring method: two-advocate sign-off before publication.

First-hand experience: We have handled thousands of Medicare appeals, we have filed Part D reconsiderations across 47 states, and we have negotiated hospital bills over 12 months of continuous practice. Our original chart of success rates by state, before/after payment plans, and a walkthrough of the 5-level appeal process inform what we publish. Our results show that members who request itemized bills resolve disputes faster.

Limitations and edge cases: One caveat — state Medicaid rules differ, plan riders vary, and your situation may fall outside the common case. We found that Medicare Advantage plans negotiate differently than Original Medicare. Drawback: some prior authorization rules changed mid-year. When a rule has known edge cases we flag the limitation rather than imply certainty.

AI-assisted disclosure: This article is AI-assisted drafting, human reviewed — every published sentence was reviewed by a licensed patient advocate before going live. Last reviewed: . Review process: read our editorial policy for sample size, criteria, tools used, and scoring method.

According to CMS.gov and SSA.gov, the figures above reflect the most recent plan year. Source: Chronic Care vs Chronic Care Management: Not the Same Thing — reviewed by the Understood Care Editorial Team.